[rollei_list] Re: rollei, level

  • From: Fred Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:59:20 +0100

Thanks much to all of you for your valuable input.
Plenty useful.

Fred



Richard Knoppow wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 7:38 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: rollei, level


This is often referred to as projection distortion by map makers and
others who must convert 3 dimensional space into 2d...

Eric Goldstein

--
    My stuff snipped....
When a two dementional surface is photographed using a standard lens the result will be an exact duplicate. Suppose you photograph a section of graph paper, the resulting negative (and print) will have exactly square divisions of exactly the same size all over, assuming for the moment a perfect lens. If one considers the viewing conditions in life a wall with equal size squares on it will be affected by diminishing perspecitive so that the squares at a distance will appear smaller than those on the viewing axis. This effect is reproduced in a photo by having the squares of equal size provided the viewing distance is correct. If one considers three dimensional objects the results are somewhat different. If one photographs an array of golf balls those at the corners will appear larger on the print than the one at the center and will also be egg shaped with the narrow end facing the center. When viewed from the center and at the right distance, the diminishing perspective as it applies to the print will make the balls again appear round and of the same size. I think the term for this is orthographic. Arial mapping requires a different rule for angle of view vs: angle of projection. In some cases, such as the famous Zeiss Pleon lens, a corrective projection lens is used to achieve orthographic projection for mapping. This corrects for the diminishing perspective of objects far from the camera so that the scale of reproduction is constant throughout the area of the image. This would also be the ideal condition for a panorama made up of a series of pictures, each with a different vanishing point. A panoram made using a rotating camera does not have a definite vanishing point. Rather, it has a vanishing line, usually at the vertical center of the picture. Another comparison is between a panoram made using an extremely wide angle lens, cropped to a narrow vertical angle vs: a rotating camera. The perspective presented by the wide angle photo is such that it looks right when presented as a flat surface, i.e., the diminishing perspective makes the picturer look right when viewed from a definite central point, namely the projection of the vanishing point. The picture made by the rotating camera look right when presented as a cylindrical surface with the viewer in the center.

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list



--
---------------------------------------------
Fred Fichter
Web http://homepage.mac.com/ffichter
Email ffichter@xxxxxxx


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: