[rollei_list] Re: question on operating and on screen for Rollei GX an
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:56:51 -0400
On 19-May-05, at 10:08 AM, Jan Decher wrote:
> Same with my 3.5E - nice camera to turn to when I feel "option
> overload" from my Contax N1 or 645...
Yeah, the E is a nice camera .... I wouldn't mind getting one! Maybe
some day - AFTER I have had my 2.8D properly Fleenored.
Cheers.
+++++
> On Thursday, May 19, 2005, at 03:02 AM, FreeLists Mailing List
> Manager wrote:
>
>> From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: question on operating and on screen for
>> Rollei GX an
>> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:34:26 -0400
>>
>>> if anyone asks me why I prefer the less advanced 2,8C (which
>>> doesn't even have a meter), all I can say is: It just feels right.
>>
>> Same with my 2.8D.
>>
>> Cheers!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
