[rollei_list] Re: are there more than one kind of Bay-II?
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:08:11 +0000 (GMT)
According your description about your lens hood, I
have no doubt your lens hood is Bay I for 6x6 or a
2.8A lens hood if it has the number "34" and the
diameter symbol engraved in the ring, it would be a
rare item but I'm afraid it is not the right and /or
more suitable lens hood for your 3.5E (or C)camera.
I was watching my cameras bayonet rings and the 2.8A
bayonet ring in several detailed photographs I have on
the 2.8A and I can say the only difference between my
Bay I Rolleicord IV and the the 2.8A size II bayonet
ring is the size. Both rings (Bay I and 2.8A size II)
have identical placement for the taking lens outer
ring accesories male holders, at 7-8 hours position,
at 12 hours position and 4-5 hours position.
In the other hand, these accesories male holders for
the Bay II from the 3.5E (or C) cameras are placed at
10-11 hours position, 1-2 hours position and 6 hours
position; the Bay III accesories male holders have
identical placement regarding the Bay II from 3.5C (or
E) cameras (always talking about the taking lens outer
ring).-
All the best
Carlos
--- steven woody <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> On 8/14/06, Carlos Manuel Freaza
> <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Steve, I have a long experience using Bay II lens
> > hoods, first with my former 3.5E and now with the
> > 3.5F, the Bay II lens hood has a point where it
> fits
> > easily, it's very difficult to fit if you can't
> find
> > the point, the point is between 10 and 11 hours
> > considering the F&H logo position regarding the 12
> > hours position on the taking lens outer ring, if
> the
> > lens hood is in the right point you turn it to 12
> > hours and it clicks easily at 12 hours coinciding
> the
> > 12 hours position for the lens hood and taking
> lens
> > ring.
>
> many thanks for the info. since my camera was
> lefted in my home and i
> am now in office, i will try the operation you
> mention as soon as i
> go back home.
>
> but, by far, after checked the picture you proviced,
> i believe my lens
> hood don't has the cut shown in the picture. it look
> like what you
> mentioned the ebay item 170016871225. and i can
> remember, the lens
> hood has a 'Rollei F&H' logo and an engraved "34Φ'
> mark. however, it
> has three inner cut in its inner ring they spaced
> with each other in
> same degree.
>
> can you say more according these clues?
>
> > BTW, the lens hood Bay II for 3.5E and 3.5F has a
> > special cut on its ring with an also special shape
> > allowing to fit it in the taking lens outer ring
> and
> > avoinding the contact with the viewing lens outer
> ring
> > (and with the shutter speeds wheel), the lens hood
> > covers the taking lens outer ring thanks to this
> > special cut.
> > If your lens hood has an entire ring without cut
> it
> > could be a Bay I lens hood for Rolleiflex 6x6 and
> > Rolleicord, or it could be a lens hood for 2.8A,
> > similar Bay II size but with an entire ring like
> the
> > Bay I lens hood I have mentioned, I think this
> lens
> > hood would be very difficult if not impossible to
> fit
> > on a 3.5E or 3.5F, I never tried it.
> > Prochnow in the Rollei Report II, pages 24-510 and
> > 24-511 shows the photographs about the lens hoodss
> > manufactured for the TLR from 1947 and their
> > descriptions, he distinguishes between lens hood
> with
> > "axialer Klemmung" and lens hoods with "radialen
> > Raststiften" according the way used to fit them in
> the
> > taking lens outer ring ( I know the practical
> meaning
> > for both fitting ways but I don't know the exact
> > translation from German into English, the first
> one
> > would be something like " axial wedging" and the
> > second one something about "radial pins").
> > The 3.5E and 3.5F lens hood have "radialen
> > Raststiften", and the lens hoods Bay 1 for 6x6 and
> the
> > Bay II for 2.8A have "axialer Klemmung", both
> types of
> > lens hoods rings cover the taking lens outer ring,
> but
> > they work different. The 2.8A lens hood has the
> F&H
> > logo and "34Ã?" according you can see in the
> photograph
> > clearly.
> > You can see a Bay II lens hood for 3.5E and 3.5F
> > cameras here:
> >
>
http://www.collectcamera.com/pagesrollei/hoodscaps/hoodmetalbay2b.htm
> >
> > and you can see a Bay I lens hood looking for the
> item
> > 170016871225 on eBay, the 2.8A lens hood looks
> very
> > similar.-
> >
> > All the best
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- steven woody <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx>
> escribió:
> >
> > > hi, list
> > >
> > > i just bought a metal Len Hood for my Rolleiflex
> > > 3.5E ( serial no
> > > 1748514 ). the seller declared it is Bay-II
> mount
> > > but i can not
> > > manage to mount it on to my lens.
> > >
> > > after carefully checked my lens mounts, i found
> the
> > > two lens mounts of
> > > my TLR are positioned one
> > > closed to another, i mean there is no gap
> between
> > > two mounts, nothing
> > > can be inserted between two mounts. so, i
> think, if
> > > a lens hood can
> > > mount the lens, it has to get a male mount and
> > > insert into the female
> > > slots of the lens mount, not covering its outer.
> > > but the lens hood on
> > > my hand gets a mount likely to be female, and
> its
> > > size make it looks
> > > like it should cover the outer of a lens mount.
> it
> > > is impossible.
> > >
> > > i don't get digicam so i can not upload picture
> for
> > > my camera and the
> > > lens hood. attached is a pic of 2.8F i got from
> > > net, which has a same
> > > ( or similar ) structure with my lens mounts. i
> > > hope you can see the
> > > problem and tell me what is the wrong.
> > >
> > > thank you in advance.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Celine: Yes, of course! Now that makes total
> sense,
> > > right? You're a
> > > Capricorn, I'm a Sagittarius, that's why we get
> > > along so well!
> > > ---
> > > Rollei List
> > >
> > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with 'subscribe'
> > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > > www.freelists.org
> > >
> > > - Unsubscribe at
> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with
> > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > > into www.freelists.org
> > >
> > > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Correo Yahoo!
> > Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y
> antispam ¡gratis!
> > ¡Abrà tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
