The inks are standard in an Epson. There are different papers but they all use one ink. Not much more than what you pay for chemicals and paper. And as I stated, cheaper to send them out. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Carlos Manuel Freaza < cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Good inks are expensive Peter, you are not including good inks cost, that > is the main cost if you print your digital work regularly.In fact, when I > want to print high quality digital files, I send it to the lab, it's cheaper > than to print them at home and I obtain a chemical print on true > photographic paper.- > > Carlos > > > --- El mié 14-ene-09, Peter K. <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> escribió: > > > De: Peter K. <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> > > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: age old digital vs film debate...again...was > RE: OT Ancient Computers > > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fecha: miércoles, 14 de enero de 2009, 3:57 pm > > Marc, > > > > Depends on the amount you shoot. A new computer is maybe > > $1k. Printer? Well, > > cheaper to send them to a lab than print then yourself. A > > DSLR about $1000. > > So if we take a roll of 36 exp and figure $10 for > > processing and you shoot > > 10,000 photos in a year (I am assuming someone is using > > this for business) > > then the cost would be $2,770 for film and developing not > > including the > > price to buy the film. So add another $5 or so per roll. > > Savings the first > > year $4100. After Computer purchased $3100. After computer > > and new Digital > > Camer purchase still a $2100 savings over processing. More > > than enough to > > pay for a printer if you want one. > > Of course, if you shot one roll a month, its not worth it. > > And if you scan > > you photos you need the Computer and Printer not factor in > > a $700-1K film > > scanner. > > And you could then sell your Leica to a collector and be > > ahead of the game. > > Peter K > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Marc James Small > > <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > > > At 10:16 AM 1/14/2009, jon.stanton@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >I have a friend/tax client whose tax returns I > > have prepared for years > > > >that "converted" from film to digital. > > His film and processing costs > > > >dropped from just over $20k to $400...he wondered > > why he owed taxes! > > > >(He refuses to pay quarterly estimates) This is a > > guy that swore with > > > >his right hand on the NYT (Holy Scripture in his > > mind) that he would > > > >NEVER -EVER go digital...Then his clients required > > it... > > > > > > And how much were his conversion costs. How much did > > he pay for the > > > digital camera? How much for the new computer? How > > much for the new > > > printer? How much for the fancy inks and spiffy > > paper? And what about the > > > need to upgrade every six months or so? Film is cheap > > and film processing > > > is cheap. Digital is EXPENSIVE and really > > inconvenient. > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Rollei List > > > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > > 'subscribe' in the > > > subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > > > > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > with 'unsubscribe' in > > > the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > > > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Peter K > > Ó¿Õ¬ > > > Yahoo! Cocina > Recetas prácticas y comida saludable > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- Peter K Ó¿Õ¬