[rollei_list] Re: Which Rolleicord
- From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:04:49 -0500
Stephen,
If you need a reason to keep the bigger Rolleiflex, allow me to offer
mine. I love both my Planar and Xenar.
In ways I can't readily describe, each provides completely satisfactory
images that are noticeably different in "character."
On those (rare) occasions I get it right, the successful photography
high is enhanced by the signature of whichever lens has participated.
It's a rare pleasure. Don't do without.
Allen Zak
On Dec 30, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Stephen Attaway wrote:
Patric:
Sorry to hear you got a bad cord iv. Mine is tack-sharp. Maybe
somebody in the dark past of the camera tried to fix a scratched lens
by swapping elements with a parts camera? That would kill the
performance, since the elements were hand matched at the factory. The
iv uses the same lens as all later rolleicords, the xenar.
The only drawback to the old xenar is the lack of built-in uv
filtering, which results in a very pronounced blue cast and 'uv flare'
at higher altitudes.
Now I keep a uv filter permanently on my rolleicord, and its
performance is so good I sometimes wonder why I am keeping my big
rolleiflexes around.
Stephen
----- Original Message ----- From: "J Patric Dahlén"
<jenspatricdahlen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Which Rolleicord
I had a Rolleicord IV and a V. The IV had the best looks, but the
lens was a "dog". The V was extremely sharp, but not in the best
condition, so I sold them both. The only Rolleicords I have now are
from before the war.
I have several accessory selftimers that I use.
/Patric
From: "Stephen Attaway" <attaway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I like my rolleicord iv because it does not have that annoying light
value shutter like the v and later cords. Instead of moving against
the resistance of a myriad of little click stops, the shutter and
aperture levers work freely with beautiful smoothness. The window
for f-stops is slightly bigger as well.
The iv does have the double-exposure prevention interlock. It also
has the old 1/50 and 1/100 second times, although you can set
intermediate times - and why not, since there are no click stops on
the shutter.
I never use a self timer, so I don't miss it. With the old shutter
on the iv you can't go to 1/500 after cocking, but I never use 1/500
either. The ground glass screen is a bit dark unless you use a
fresnel or have a spare beattie screen..
I got my iv from Jimmy Koh. No problems so far.
_________________________________________________________________
Recept till glöggen i helgen
http://arla.msn.se/Partner/Msn/index____18291.aspx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
