Interesting to see that the Es are the heaviest of the 2.8 TLRs, but the F3.5 wins in the 3.5 category. On 11/4/05, Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Here is a brief list of the approximate weights of the Rolleiflex TLR > camera bodies. Add a bit for lens hoods, filters, straps, and the like or > even more if you use a "never-ready" case: > > Original 715g to 722g > Old Standard 780g to 800g > Automat I-III 920g > New Standard 900g > 3.5/X 980g > 3.5A/MX 970g > 3.5B/MX-EVS 980g > 3.5C//3.5E 1120g > 3.5F 1220g > 3.5E2 and E3 1120g > > The Rolleiflex T line runs: > > Rolleiflex T 1020g > > The Rolleicords run: > > Rolleicord 745g - 940g > > Miscellany: > > Tele-Rolleiflex 1535g > Weitwinkel-Rolleiflex 1355g > > Rolleimagic 1000g > Rolleimagic II 1000g > > and, finally, the 2.8's: > > 2.8A 1080g > 2.8B 1080g > 2.8C 1140g > 2.8D 1140g > 2.8E 1255g > 2.8F 1220g > 2.8E2 1250g > 2.8E3 1250g > 2.8GX 1225g - 1240g > 2.8FX no data > > A kilogram -- 1000 grams -- is the same as 2.2504 pounds, so these guys > weigh in at between 1 pounds, 9 ounces, to 3 pounds, 8 ounces, if my maths > are correct. > > I may someday do the same for the Baby Rolleiflex Line, but I will leave > the Studio Rolleis to Jerry, the one member of our esteemed number who > actually owns one of these gems. > > Marc > > > > > > > > > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! > > NEW FAX NUMBER: +540-343-8505 > > > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org> > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org> > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- Peter K Ó¿Õ¬