Richard, Do you mean to say that the MacIntosh 275 that I bought from my company's surplus store for $20 is a good deal? A case of assorted tubes (valves) came with it. I would have thought that my pair of Marantz 9s were superior, but WTF do I know. Jerry Richard Knoppow wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Javier Perez" <summarex@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 8:28 PM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Wanted to Buy Macintosh SE/30 > > > Did you know that Apple had to license the Mac's name from > > McIntosh labs? > > Some of the computers even say so on the back. I love > > audio macs! > > Javier > > > > Frank McIntosh's secret was a patented method of winding > the transformers to achieve close coupling (necessary for > Class B amplifiers) without high interwinding reactances > (cause distortion). He came up with the idea of bifilar > winding, that is, both windings were made at the same time > with the wires next to each other. I don't have the patent > number. The split load idea was not new, you will find it in > some older engineering books. It was used in the British > made Quad amplifier before the McIntosh. His other secret > was very high quality construction using the best components > available. > When I was in college I sold Hi-Fi part time. I was able > to compare McIntosh directly to other amplifiers and it blew > them away; I was astonished at how much cleaner they sounded > than some other, very highly reputed, amplifiers. I also had > a chance to compare one to a Marantz 8-B on the bench. The > 8-B has inadequate power supply capacity and goes banannas > when overloaded, all sorts of junk shows up. The Mac just > produced clean square waves. > Transformer coupling is a practical necessity for vacuum > tube audio amplifiers, however its not for solid state > circuits. Macintosh continued to use transformer coupling in > their solid state amplifers because the transformers were > their claim to fame. There was probably an advantage to > being able to use matched components for the output but > transformerless amplifers have many advantages and better > quality unless the transformer is of unusual quality. > My hearing is no longer good enough to allow me to > pronounce on audio components but when it was I was not a > vacuum tube advocate: I lived with vacuum tube stuff for too > long to be enamored of its aging problems. > BTW, I am in the last stages of restoring two vacuum tube > short wave receivers of the sort known as boat anchors. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 09/15/2006 --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list