[rollei_list] Re: Tripod versus handheld redux
- From: Kirk Thompson <thompsonkirk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Rollei List <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:42:07 -0700
Yes, there are two ways now of making commercial proof sheets – with photo
paper exposed through a Print-File, which causes a bit of blur because of the
thickness of the plastic; and in a digital processing machine, for example a
Norita, which color-corrects & perhaps even sharpens each frame separately.
One way fuzzes everything a bit, & the other makes the negatives look better
than they are. Neither is as accurate as the oldest-fashioned way of putting
the negatives in a printing frame, under glass & over photo paper.
Kirk
> Subject: [rollei_list] Tripod versus handheld redux
> From: starboy0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:37:15 -0500
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Well my last post implying that the Rollei TLR might require a tripod more
> than a 35mm was based on the proof sheet I received. I didn't even stop to
> think that proof sheets aren't always that crystal clear.
>
> When I got some 8x10 prints back today, well, WOW!!!!!
>
> They were sharp as razor blades and the detail and resolution knocked my
> socks off! All shots were hand held.
>
> I love this camera!
>
> Bob
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
Other related posts:
