Ardie, That is dead wrong. I corresponded with Herr Prochnow and asked this eaxct question. He wrote the Rollei report and held various positions at the Rollei factory during this time. The T was never made with a 220 option. That link indicating such is complete nonsense. FWIW, just because it is on the internet does not make it true. Peter K On 4/21/05, Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >=20 > On Thursday, April 21, 2005, at 01:26 PM, Bob Shell wrote: >=20 > > There is a 220 Rollei T > > There is a 220 Rollei T > > There is a 220 Rollei T > > > > So now it's true and we can stop worrying about it every time it comes > > up here. >=20 > Of course it's true. Marc says so at > <http://www.foto.no/rolleiflex/Rolleiflex-t.html>. >=20 > Cheers. >=20 >=20 --=20 Peter K =D3=BF=D5=AC