[rollei_list] Re: The new Fuji will be sold as.
- From: FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:21:06 +0000 (GMT)
It would probably also need a 100mm lens or so and this would be very bulky as
a 6 element planar type, this new camera already has a bulky front door already
because of the rather deep 6 element 80mm lens.
Nice though!
Frank
--- On Wed, 1/10/08, Austin Franklin <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Austin Franklin <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: The new Fuji will be sold as.
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, 1 October, 2008, 5:58 PM
> Yes, 2cm...sorry.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Thor Legvold
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:42 PM
> > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: The new Fuji will be sold
> as.
> >
> >
> > 2mm?!?
> >
> > Or 2cm...?
> >
> > Thor
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1 Oct, 2008, at 18:35, Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > Yes considerably. 2mm ;-)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Austin
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rollei_list-
> > > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Richard
> Sintchak
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:32 PM
> > > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: The new Fuji will be
> sold as.
> > >
> > > Size? It would be considerably larger if it was
> 6x9 I'd think.....
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:34 AM, John Wild
> <JWild@millstream-
> > > hotel.co.uk> wrote:
> > > Use a Dremel grinder to enlarge the film gate?
> ;-)
> > >
> > > From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rollei_list-
> > > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Bischof
> > > Sent: 01 October 2008 16:31
> > > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [rollei_list] The new Fuji will be sold
> as.
> > >
> > > Why did they have to make it a 6x7? If it was a
> 6x9, I might have
> > > considered it...
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Richard S.
> > > San Francisco
> > >
> > > My Photography Website
> > > http://www.lightshadowandtone.com
> > >
> > > My Flickr River
> > >
> http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/
> > >
> > > My Commute Photo Blog
> > > http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/
> >
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by
> logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
