[rollei_list] Re: Take a look

  • From: TrueBadger@xxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:49:15 -0500

In a message dated 2/14/2005 10:27:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, Stan Yoder 
<s.yoder@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Here's something interesting (a verrrrrrrrrrry late 2.8F):
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3354&item=3874302913&rd=1
>
>Stan Yoder

>Pittsburgh
>

That's kind of interesting.  I have two 2.8f's ... one purchased mint used in 
1971 from a guy who had had it a year and who wanted a Hasselblad, and the 
other purchased new about 1976.  I always wondered why the second one had the 
whiteface, now I know. 

Both are planars, and the only other differences I can see between the two 
cameras is that the second one has a plastic "tip" at the end of the "peg" that 
fits into the hole on the right side of the film spool, whereas on the earlier 
camera, this "tip" is metal, and the fact that the lens cap shipped with the 
later one was plastic instead of metal (since replaced because I like the metal 
ones better).

The case shown with the one listed on ebay looks to me to be older than would 
have been shipped in 76 or thereabouts, because of the metal "medallion" on the 
front of the case, but I leave that to the real experts.

G. King



Other related posts: