Jerry, All I asked is what is a TLR 50? Maybe using the TLR with 80mm as if it were a 50mm on a 35mm camera? Personally, I never cared for Leicas or the mystique about them. I have never been comfortable using them. Hate the stupid way to load film and could not live with the 1/50 sync speed. I much prefer SLRs. Yes, there are a few exceptions for me. I use a few inexpensive rangefinders like the Olympus XA or an old Yashica Lynx with a very sharp 50mm F1.4 lens, and also on ocassion a Rolleikin in my TLR. Aside that, I rarely use anything but SLRs for 35mm. Peter K On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:35:32 -0800, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wro= te: > Peter and Bob Shell, >=20 > Dearth of Leicas? I have and use three of them. In my year long assignm= ents > in Japan and the UK, I carried a Leica with 3 lenses; a 21mm, 35mm and a > 90mm. Notice, no 50mm! Too confining. >=20 > Jerry >=20 > "Peter K." wrote: >=20 > > What is a Rollei TLR 50? > > > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:10:36 -0500, dnygr <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Seeing all the cameras used I'm surprised at the dearth of Leicas. > > >=3D20 > > > My feeling is that Leicas and Rolleis go together. I like to use a Ro= llei=3D > > TLR 50, a Leica M6 with a 35mm lens, a Hasselblad 38mm biogon and a Ho= rsem=3D > > an 6x12 with a Rodenstock 65. I don't care much for longer lenses as yo= u ca=3D > > n all probably tell. Maybe some day I will. As of today, I don't. > > >=3D20 > > > Doug Nygren > > >=3D20 > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > >=3D20 > > >=3D20 > > > > --=3D20 > > Peter K > > =3DD3=3DBF=3DD5=3DAC >=20 >=20 --=20 Peter K =D3=BF=D5=AC