Hi Thor, I am an amateur photographer too. My work is in the Motor Racing business (for 30+ years) and know most of the pros well, particularly those that have been around a long time. One of them told me a few years ago, when the digital bodies were more expensive than now, that his body cost about the same as 3 months film, so changing the camera every couple of years was still a huge saving for him. FWIW Frank On 24 Nov, 2009, at 17:37, Thor Legvold wrote: > , I wonder what the equipment costs are today vs 30 years ago - a few good > bodies and a collection of nice glass that basically lasted for years and > years, with film costs as the expendables vs. a digital body or two with > modern glass, the difference being that digital body manufacturers seem to > encourage 'upgrades' every few years, and the prices are pretty steep. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list