[rollei_list] Re: Scanner decision
- From: Per Ohstrom <ohstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:46:43 +0200
Thanks for the links, Fred. I'll examine the reviews carefully.
Per
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:42:35 +0200, Frederic Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Scanners/
> Epson_F3200/page-1.htm :
> "I think Epson has got it wrong with this scanner. It probably won't
> appeal to a professional or keen hobbyist and it's overpriced for the
> consumer. The F-3200 is basically a flatbed scanner repackaged in a more
> conveniently sized box. There is a lot of technology in this scanner,
> most of it is over the top for professional use, for a consumer this may
> appeal but the price needs to be cut drastically. At a lower price of
> around £100 this scanner would make a perfect partner to the EPSON
> PictureMate, at £549 it is overpriced. If you need excellent quality
> scans then take another look at the 4870 or wait for the new 4990 due
> early 2005"
>
> You should go the 4990 way if you want an Epson (it's the third
> generation of Epson flatbeds that I buy and I'm very happy with it, does
> a much better job with dense b&w negs than the 3200, for instance).
>
> Review here : http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%
> 204990/Page%201.htm
>
> Fred
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
