I try to take each picture one at a time. I had a bunch of stuff on a wall recently, and I was pleased with myself for having matching frames and matting. But they were all basically 16x20 cut to either 4:5 or 2:3, and frankly, it was a little boring. I want to do 20X24 based prints, but I think I should probably start making 11x14's again too. I will continue to try to make each picture look as good as I can, regardless of which camera I'm using, and let the catalog take care of itself On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Marvin Wallace <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Marvin Wallace > One of the motivations for getting the "correct" ratio, is that if you > continually change cameras (like me), you end up with a catalogue of work > that doesn't fit together very well. You perhaps will have beautiful 6 X 6 > portraits and then 2.4 x 3.6 portraits done with a nice lens such as a > summicron 90. > Though I have been unable to live up to my own ideal, it is good to use as > few cameras as possible, so I would argue against the many ratio's are good > hypothesis. > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- Be Just and Fear Not