Thanks for all the kind replies. I scan all my negs so I believe I can get a similar look with PS when and if needed. I'm selling those Rolleisofts if anyone's interested. Richard S. San Francisco My Commute Photo Blog http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/ My Flickr Page http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich8155/ On 11/26/06, Jerry Lehrer < jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Petr, No, completely different. R'softs are scribed circular lines. Softars are little bubbles in a plastic disc. Jerry Petr Dvorak wrote: How do Rolleisofts compare to CZ Softars? Are they similar filters sold under different brands? Petr Dvorak On 11/26/06, *Eric Goldstein* < egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Richard - > > I've always found them pretty much useless, much too heavy handed as > you say. My solution is to shoot lenses that have un- or > under-corrected spherical wide open, as the classic portrait lenses > have. In the past, I've had pretty good luck in MF shooting fast > triplets like the Zeiss Triotar found on the old Rolleicords. I also > have a Welta 66 folder with a 75/2.9 Meyers Trioplan which is really > nice for this application. > > Eric Goldstein > > -- > > > > > ------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.0.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.16/551 - Release Date: 11/25/2006
-- Richard S. San Francisco My Commute Photo Blog http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/ My Flickr Page http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich8155/