[rollei_list] Re: Rolleinar 3 poll
- From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:56:11 -0500
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>>
>>
>> I am guilty of using a Kodak close up filter on the back of my 14 inch red
>> dot
>> artar. It is about the size of a rolleinar. I love the quality and the
>> ability to reach around my camera to focus while looking at the ground glass.
>> Dennis
>
>
> I love being able to put filters on the back of a lens. Or in this case
> dilators what ever you'd really call them.
> I think an issue would be you get better coverage If you needed it with a
> longer bellows draw not using the additional lens. I did get the impression
> I got sharper results with my lens and camera not using the additives.
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
Diopter I meant. Or Dioptre perhaps...
This guys says : " usage akin to calling an electric heater a "watt" -"
http://imaginatorium.org/stuff/cufilter.htm
[Rabs]
Mark William Rabiner
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
