Richard, You are absolutely right again! The top lip of the Rolleikin must be pushed in first and the rest snaps flush into place. Never had this problem before... Really slipping up... Thanks, Lance Selma, NC 27576 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In a message dated 10/15/2008 9:37:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: ----- Original Message ----- From: <Choiliefan@xxxxxxx> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:27 PM Subject: [rollei_list] Rolleikin 2.8 to 3.5 questions >I have most of a Rolleikin 2.8 II which I'm attempting to >mount in an MX-EVS > 3.5 with counter installed. > > Problem seems to be that the ratchet pawl (?) on the 35mm > film gate assembly > stands proud of the take-up spool and seems a tight fit > against the camera > back. > > Never had a problem mounted in a 2,8C and I've always > assumed the basic > difference between 2.8 and 3.5 models is the front cover > for the lens shade. > According to an old copy of the Practical Accessories, the > Rolleikin in question > should work in bodies numbered 11000000 and up. > > Any help, suggestions, etc greatly appreciated. > Health, Peace > Lance > Selma, NC 27576 > I don't have the Rollikin you do but I do have a Rolleikin C which I use in a 2.8E. I just checked the film gate and metering part in a Rolleicord IV and compared it with the older Rolleikin I use in that camera. Both sit flat and the film rails are exactly in line with the rollers. Make sure the gate mechanism is really all the way in the 120 film gate. There is an undercut part at the top of the adaptor which fits under the top of the 120 film gate. If it isn't fitted right it will prevent the adaptor from seating completely and will also tilt it. I use a small straight edge to check the fit. -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Rollei List **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002)