[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8E value
- From: Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:54:10 -0400
At 11:29 AM 8/23/2006 -0700, Stephen Attaway wrote:
>I suspect many more 'e's were sold than all the follow on
>'f's and 't's combined. Thats true of the M3/M2 vs later
>Leicas, because of the Nikon F.
>
>Anyone have sales figures?
Here are the factory production figures:
2.8A 9,870
2.8B 1,250
2.8C 30,150
2.8D 20,100
2.8E 44,000
2.8F 82,800
2.8E2 7,000
2.8E3 2,025
3.5C/E 43,000
3.5F (1) 20,000
3.5F (2) 11,500
3.5F (3) 121,000
3.5E2 (1) 2,000
3.5E (2) 2,000
3.5E3 5,035
Rolleiflex T 99,000
I realize that sales figures might be lower than production numbers, but I
doubt if the differences would be great -- who has ever heard of basements
full of unsold Rolleiflex TLR cameras in the basement?
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
