[rollei_list] Re: Rollei SL2000F and 3003: Quality

  • From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:57:17 -0300

After to read the previous messages, my conclusion is that the only
reliable product made by Rollei along the history was the Twin Lens
Reflex.

Carlos

2010/3/30  <Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx>:
> Of course when I hear about the production of the first batches of the SL2000 
> to highest quality standards I have to mention that there have been a lot of 
> quality issues in the first batches.
>
> I got one with a serial no. starting with 6 (someone should know which year 
> this means, I have forgotten the internal code).
> Honestly spoken, all cameras with the 6 should have been returned and 
> overhauled.
>
> It is also not true, that the production was fully in Germany.
>
> Many parts came from Singapore, and they were used to assemble the camera in 
> Germany. The film magazines came fully from Singapore. Well, the magazines 
> had also a major issue of light leaks and double exposure.
> After the insolvency of Rollei and the continuation as Fototechnic it was 
> also an issue for them to make the parts themself as there was no more a 
> Singapore plant.
> I bought my Rollei 2000F  directly from the liquidator (i.e. from Rollei 
> Deutschland) when Rollei Fototechnic started operation. This was a batch 
> which had remained with the liquidator, although it was agreed that 
> Fototechnic should make production and marketing of all 2000F. Fototechnic 
> was not really happy about these types of business of the liquidator. Anyway, 
> I had full warranty, and later on, Fototechnic had to fix all issues.
> Finally, I got the body 5 times changed because a lot a bugs could not be 
> fixed directly.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dirk
>
>
> Phone: +49 531 295 2545
> Mobile: +49 172 295 4416
> Fax: +49 531 295 2550
> E-mail: Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von CarlosMFreaza
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. März 2010 16:36
> An: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei SL2000F and 3003: VERY LONG
>
> The 2000F was not a Rollei internal invention, it was a prototype presented 
> to Rollei as Heinz Waaske presented the Rollei 35 prototype, with the 
> difference the Rollei 35 prototype was almost ready to production,  the 
> photographs shown in the Report 3 and the work that Prochnow made with others 
> to develop the prototypes are not bogus, anyway it is not impossible the 
> architect Franzmann took the idea from some previous camera.
>
> When you asked me about that contact with Prochnow he already was very ill, 
> he wrote me at the time that Rollei was something very far away in the time 
> to him.
> BTW a beer is always a good thing.
>
> Carlos
>
> 2010/3/30 Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> And, again, this is bogus, Carlos.  The few remaining Zeiss Ikon
>> records -- and the few Zeiss Ikon executives of the time who are still
>> around --  make that certain.  Yeah, RolleiLunatics really DO want to
>> believe the 2000F was an internal invention but the surviving
>> historical record makes this a really bogus claim.
>>
>> Back when Prochnow was alive, I asked you to put me in touch with him
>> over this issue, and you failed to do so.  I really would have enjoyed
>> sharing a beer with you and Prochnow and Wolf Wehren over the demise of 
>> Zeiss Ikon.
>>  We all would have learned a lot!
>>
>> If this is NOT true, why did Zeiss Ikon present a working SL 2000F at
>> the
>> 1972 Photokina?  One of our List members picked it up and played with
>> it, and it worked.
>>
>> If you want to agree that Zeiss Ikon passed on a one-off hand-made
>> camera to Rolleiflex in 1974, I have no problem.  But the camera did
>> work -- again, one of our members used it and it worked for him -- and
>> then Rolleiflex had to reinvent the wheel to turn this into a
>> commercial product, I have no problem -- there is a surviving memo to
>> the Zeiss Foundation from Zeiss Ikon in 1971 spelling out the problems
>> they would have in producing this in real-time.
>>
>> But to suggest, as your RolleiFanatics do, that the SL 2000F was an
>> internal Rollei development is so much gibberish.  Let us accept the
>> magnificent efforts Rollei made to perfect an imperfect Zeiss Ikon
>> product.  The historical record on this is clear.  Let us not ever
>> disregard the work of Prochnow but he was just flat wrong on this.
>>
>> You have not read my book?
>>
>> Marc
>>
>>
>> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
>>
>> ---
>> Rollei List
>>
>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in
>> the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe'
>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Online, searchable archives are available at
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>>
>>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at 
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: