After to read the previous messages, my conclusion is that the only reliable product made by Rollei along the history was the Twin Lens Reflex. Carlos 2010/3/30 <Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx>: > Of course when I hear about the production of the first batches of the SL2000 > to highest quality standards I have to mention that there have been a lot of > quality issues in the first batches. > > I got one with a serial no. starting with 6 (someone should know which year > this means, I have forgotten the internal code). > Honestly spoken, all cameras with the 6 should have been returned and > overhauled. > > It is also not true, that the production was fully in Germany. > > Many parts came from Singapore, and they were used to assemble the camera in > Germany. The film magazines came fully from Singapore. Well, the magazines > had also a major issue of light leaks and double exposure. > After the insolvency of Rollei and the continuation as Fototechnic it was > also an issue for them to make the parts themself as there was no more a > Singapore plant. > I bought my Rollei 2000F directly from the liquidator (i.e. from Rollei > Deutschland) when Rollei Fototechnic started operation. This was a batch > which had remained with the liquidator, although it was agreed that > Fototechnic should make production and marketing of all 2000F. Fototechnic > was not really happy about these types of business of the liquidator. Anyway, > I had full warranty, and later on, Fototechnic had to fix all issues. > Finally, I got the body 5 times changed because a lot a bugs could not be > fixed directly. > > > Regards > > > Dirk > > > Phone: +49 531 295 2545 > Mobile: +49 172 295 4416 > Fax: +49 531 295 2550 > E-mail: Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von CarlosMFreaza > Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. März 2010 16:36 > An: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei SL2000F and 3003: VERY LONG > > The 2000F was not a Rollei internal invention, it was a prototype presented > to Rollei as Heinz Waaske presented the Rollei 35 prototype, with the > difference the Rollei 35 prototype was almost ready to production, the > photographs shown in the Report 3 and the work that Prochnow made with others > to develop the prototypes are not bogus, anyway it is not impossible the > architect Franzmann took the idea from some previous camera. > > When you asked me about that contact with Prochnow he already was very ill, > he wrote me at the time that Rollei was something very far away in the time > to him. > BTW a beer is always a good thing. > > Carlos > > 2010/3/30 Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> And, again, this is bogus, Carlos. The few remaining Zeiss Ikon >> records -- and the few Zeiss Ikon executives of the time who are still >> around -- make that certain. Yeah, RolleiLunatics really DO want to >> believe the 2000F was an internal invention but the surviving >> historical record makes this a really bogus claim. >> >> Back when Prochnow was alive, I asked you to put me in touch with him >> over this issue, and you failed to do so. I really would have enjoyed >> sharing a beer with you and Prochnow and Wolf Wehren over the demise of >> Zeiss Ikon. >> We all would have learned a lot! >> >> If this is NOT true, why did Zeiss Ikon present a working SL 2000F at >> the >> 1972 Photokina? One of our List members picked it up and played with >> it, and it worked. >> >> If you want to agree that Zeiss Ikon passed on a one-off hand-made >> camera to Rolleiflex in 1974, I have no problem. But the camera did >> work -- again, one of our members used it and it worked for him -- and >> then Rolleiflex had to reinvent the wheel to turn this into a >> commercial product, I have no problem -- there is a surviving memo to >> the Zeiss Foundation from Zeiss Ikon in 1971 spelling out the problems >> they would have in producing this in real-time. >> >> But to suggest, as your RolleiFanatics do, that the SL 2000F was an >> internal Rollei development is so much gibberish. Let us accept the >> magnificent efforts Rollei made to perfect an imperfect Zeiss Ikon >> product. The historical record on this is clear. Let us not ever >> disregard the work of Prochnow but he was just flat wrong on this. >> >> You have not read my book? >> >> Marc >> >> >> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! >> >> --- >> Rollei List >> >> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in >> the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >> >> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' >> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >> >> - Online, searchable archives are available at >> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >> >> > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the > subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list