I still have a Rollei A110 & E110 sitting on a shelf. The images were not as sharp as I had expected from a Rollei - fine from a Kodak Instamatic 110 though - and found that the film was not held against the film gate by the cartridge - no fault of the camera but the cartridge system. I cut down a piece of clear acetate and lifting the paper leader a little, fitted it between the cartridge and the backing paper, this then pressed the emulsion against the film gate. The acetate was removed before sending the cartridge for processing and inserted into the next cartridge. Images were very sharp from then on. I also have a Rollei 16 and having bought a 100m roll of single perf. 16mm Tri-X, I 'rolled my own'. The resulting images were bitingly sharp although suffering from grain when enlarged to full plate. I also reversal processed the Tri-X which produced very contrasty transparencies. Home loading such a small size film gave rise to scratches on the emulsion whilst trying to keep the film tight on the spool. I did buy rolls of colour transparency and negative film too but never tried them because of processing issues. I see that Rollei 16 B&W film is being sold on Ebay by 'subtimes' - Item No. 200416825357 (and other types of 16mm cartridges too) John On 14/01/2010 03:30, "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You could get a sharp picture in 110, and there were several fine 110 > cameras, including a couple from Rollei. You just couldn't get a big > enlargement. Considering 99% of all images were never enlarged beyond > 4 x 6, that was not a problem for mot shooters... --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list