[rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE

  • From: marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:12:36 GMT

Thank you Fred for that straight forward and honest assessment of the 35 I 
agree.
Marvin.
Sent via BlackBerry® from 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Frédéric Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:55:55 
To:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE


Yeap, sure, we would all love to have a rangefinder on the Rollei 35. And it's 
a bit hard to accurately frame on close objects.
But, all in all, a reliable thing on which you can control everything, with a 
good lens. More often than enough that's all one needs to take a good picture...

Fred



On Monday, October 01, 2007, at 03:40PM, <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Fred I can live with the difference of opinion quite happily. I would like to 
>quote a source since you have, and that is to say C. Bresson achived great 
>results with a primitive RF something I don't think even he could have done 
>with a Rollei 35.
>Marvin.
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: