[rollei_list] Re: Retro: Back to the Past!
- From: Chris Brown <cpbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:29:36 +0100
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:39:03AM -0500, Neil Gould wrote:
> Well, on this we can agree, to a point. However, unless there is some
> really obvious flaw in Marc's method of scanning, the recipient would have
> no way to know whether they have received "the best possible scan" of his
> slides within the constraints of his system. I suspect that Chris Browns'
> offer presumes that the scan is usable and just needs proper tweaking to
> get a presentable image.
I haven't assumed that, but I'm interested in having a look at one of Marc's
scans to see if it is usable or not. Even if it's a bit borderline, whether
I can get a better end-result by a bit of tweaking or not might help provide
some ideas about where the potential improvements are (e.g. scanning,
editing, printingt, or a combination of them).
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
