[rollei_list] Re: Press Cameras

  • From: Jon stanton <Jon.stanton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:56:17 -0700

I have a Speed Graphic for anyone interested

Olympia, WA

On Mar 24, 2012, at 2:20 PM, "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Williams" <dwilli10@xxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:18 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Press Cameras
> 
> 
>> Just a random comment-
>> 
>> Today I just happened to watch, on TV, the show about the "21" quiz
>> show where Charles vanDoren and others were found to have been given
>> answers to the questions.  Maybe half of you will remember it.
>> 
>> As I watched the movie, I noticed there were many press cameras and
>> some pretty cheap cameras in the courtroom scenes.
>> 
>> From a very young age I wanted a press camera, maybe a Speed
>> Graphic, or something similar.  I now realize that having a press
>> camera would have been a real bother and I would have had no need for one.
>> 
>> Are there others who had the same thoughts as a young amateur photographer?
>> 
>> DAW
>> 
>    I remember 21 and the awful scandal it brought about. It seems to me that 
> cheating was found to be common on these high-jackpot shows.  All meant to 
> make the shows more exciting for the audience and sell more soap or 
> cigarettes or whatever.
>    The Speed Graphic was the standard press camera.  There _were_ others such 
> as the B&J camera.  After the Crown Graphic came out in 1947 a lot of photogs 
> switched to them because they were noticeably lighter.  The difference is 
> that the Crown does not have the focal plane shutter of the Speed. Busch also 
> made good folding cameras, and at one time, advertised one with a focal plane 
> shutter in it.  This was probably to meet a military spec for the Speed but 
> the Busch shutter was much advance over the very crude one found in the Speed 
> Graphic and Graflex cameras.  I've never seen one of these Busch cameras in 
> the flesh so I don't think many were made.  I had a Busch Pressman long ago 
> (a burglar go it) it was a fine camera.
>    The Speed Graphic became the defacto standard press camera sometime around 
> the late 1920s.  Previously the Graflex SLR was very often used, especially 
> in the 5x7 size. The story, which may be apocryphal, is that a N.Y.Times 
> photog was using his Graflex to photograph an automobile race and was hit and 
> killed by a run-away car because his face was in the hood and he could not 
> see it. The Times forbid the use of Graflex cameras and so did other papers 
> so the Speed Graphic came to the fore.
>    The film of the time tended to be grainy so having a large negative was a 
> virtue. Also, plates and sheet film lent themselves well to rapid processing. 
> Also, the usual technique was to use a powerful flash, stop the lens down, 
> and use the camera as pretty much a fixed-focus or guess focus camera to 
> speed up action.  Even if the wanted image was captured on only a corner of 
> the negative it could still be blown up with enough detail for the very low 
> resolution half-tone printing of the time (sometimes with lines drawn around 
> the important parts).  After WW-2 smaller cameras began to make inroads. 
> Initially Rolleiflexes started to appear and then 35mm cameras.
>   I was brought up on press cameras.  One of my teachers in highschool had 
> been a working press photographer and showed me how to use a Speed Graphic, 
> both to take pictures and as a weapon (metal re-inforced corners). I still 
> like these old dinosaurs and can work pretty fast with one.
>   Of course, modern press work is simply to point your cell phone at the 
> subject and take a low frame rate movie of it. One can then select the right 
> picture.  In the old days one had to have a nose for the "right moment".
> 
> 
> --
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles
> WB6KBL
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the 
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: