[rollei_list] Re: Plus X with Perceptol

  • From: Douglas Nygren <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:40:55 -0500

Mark,
Let me know if I understand you correctly in respect to gaining more sharpness.

To get that, you would go in the direction Carlos recommended for film shot at 125, namely, dilute 1:3 and develop for 16 minutes and then experiment. For the Jobo, I'll cut back development time 10%,

Thank you for your comments--Doug


On Feb 20, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

Doug:
          I wrote you'll need to do some tests and I only suggested as
a try Perceptol full strength 10' for EI 125, you interpreted my
suggestion right, however I think Allen is right too, I did not think
about the film speed  restrainer dilution issue and then I suggest now
two ways to start:

1) Exposing the Film at ISO 64 and developing it with Perceptol full
strength at 68/20ºC for 8' , you'll gain fine grain (Ilford
instructions).

2) Exposing the film for its ISO 125 nominal speed and developing it
with Perceptol 1:3 during 18' ( Digitaltruth suggestion for Plux X
35mm, but it must work for 120), you'll lose a bit of fine grain but
you'll win sharpness.

As I explained, these are developing times for the Plus X pre-2007,
but Kodak says the devoloping times variations are very slight for the
later version and Digitaltruth says old times are good starting
points.

Carlos
PS: Anyway I have no doubt you could obtain usable negs with my
original try suggestion.


Believe me the price you pay for finer grain straight or not very diluted is high. Make one print from a straight developed neg and another with one at the maximum dilution and you'll see a marked difference. The higher dilution
will show more more grain sure but at extremely higher clarity and
sharpness. The print from the straight neg will look very soft. Like from a
lens in extreme need of cleaning.
Normally you'll want to dilute as much as you can until grain starts getting to be an issue for you. So it may depend on if you tend to print at 11x14 or 8x10. Most finer workers would rather be looking at sharp regular grain than
mush and prints which look like they were taken with plastic lenes.
You just never run film straight. Never. Unless you were maybe developing
sheet film in a tray. And not even then. At least go 1:1.

[Rabs]
Mark William Rabiner



---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list



---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: