I can see that since I started in the darkroom in the late 60's and doing photography there have been films I didn't care for all that much but knowing other very good photographers who did like them and in most cases we'd be using different developers. Though it didn't take exactly that for me to realize that some films worked well in some developers and some do not. I'd tend to have a favorite developer and use the films which worked the best with them. Some of my photographer friends also took that tact but others picked out a film and then found a developer / dilution to work with it. In the late 90s I went through an Xtol 1:3 period the whole second half of the decade I'm sure. What I fond with Xtol 1:3 is if I could NOT use my favorite films (they were out) just about any film worked amazingly. An exception being plus x as is well documented. And Delta 3200. So I started pretty much thinking that it didn't matter which film I'd use just as long as I ran it in Xtol 1:3. I wasn't going to sweat Ilford over Kodak. And as so much of the work that I and most people did were with solvent developers what the issue was was not the developer itself. But the dilution. You use just about any solvent developer straight or 1:1 its going to look like mush. But dilute it to the maximum and it will sharpen up for you but of course you have to stop at a point where you start getting too much grain. All in all there is a lot of developing; printing, then tweaking the development going on. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list