[rollei_list] Re: Planar HFT 1,8/50 and Rolleiflex SL35 E

  • From: "Evan Dong" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "ejdong@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:42:54 -0700

Carlos,

How does the Rolleinar 200mm compares against the Tessar 200mmF4 and the CZJ 
200mmF2.8 (M42)?

I use on my Contax Aria & 159MM two (M42) lenses. An older Pentax M-42 200mm 
F3.5 and the CZJ 200mm. 

I like the CZJ 200mm for its sharpest.

Evan



On Saturday, July 12, 2014 7:51 AM, CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 


Rolleinar MC 3,5/200mm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/14633671252/

Planar HFT 1,8/50
https://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/14447514328/

Carlos


2014-06-28 9:59 GMT-03:00 CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>:
> When my father liked photography in the '50s and '60s, he always had
> in his photographic suitcase the Rolleiflex 2.8C for B&W shots and a
> Voss Diax IIb or a Leica IIIc for color shots (BTW, sometimes he used
> the Rolleiflex for color shots and the 35mm cameras for B&W, but it
> was not the general rule). Last week-end I put in my bag a 3,5F for
> B&W shots and the Rolleiflex SL35 E for color shots, it was the first
> time I used the SL35 E and its Planar HFT 1,8/50 lens. Camera and lens
> worked fine (click on the upper arrows for a larger image):
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/14332263329/
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/14515472481/
>
> Carlos
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2014