[rollei_list] Re: On the History of the 2.8/80 CZ Hasselblad Planar
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:57:41 -0400
At 08:36 AM 7/12/2008, Carlos Manuel Freaza wrote:
>Marc, I was not writing about the Hasselblad history, the fact you are
>giving some details about the Hasselblad lenses don't change things;
>as you wrote, the five elements Planar 2.8/80 was a prototype only and
>it did not work for the Hasselblad, however it worked more than fine
>for the Rolleiflex TLR, the difference is the mirror and the camera
>construction.
CARLOS
IT IS NOT THE SAME LENS. The Rolleiflex TLR
Planar is much smaller in both width and depth
than was the prototype five-element lens for the
500C. Sauer stated that he had to design the
Hasselblad lens from scratch. Zeiss didn't just
pull lenses from the F&H runs and send them to
Hasselblad: they developed an entirely new lens
design based on a common formula.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
