I have used auto exposure bracketing on occasions where there is very contrasty lighting, well above the dynamic range of the digital camera to capture with a single exposure. I would then choose selected areas from the underexposed shot (which exposed the highlights well) and clone those 'better exposed' highlights on to areas of the 'normally exposed' shot. Kind of a poor mans HDR rendition. True HDR has not impressed me as it always seems to look artificial, but replacing blown highlights with a different capture that has some detail in those highlights is a reasonable approach I think. Regards, Charlie Silverman In a message dated 3/28/2012 2:16:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dwilli10@xxxxxxx writes: At 02:53 AM 3/28/2012, Laurence wrote, in part: In practice shooting I would expect the entire capture process to take place on a fractions of a second time scale, which might preclude very active shots, but which would cover most normal shooting. It would in principle be similar to the automatic bracketing that some high end film cameras indulge in if you let them. All the best Laurence Cuffe The last couple of digital cameras I have had will automatically shoot at least 3 sequential shots under and over exposed by a value you can control. I haven't tried it yet, partly because I haven't needed to do it and partly because the documentation and options are beyond comprehension by the average human bean. DAW