[rollei_list] Re: OT: Super Ikonta B and III and IV

  • From: Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:25:21 -0700

Marvin,

Yes I did.  Cute camera, but I did prefer the Retina IIIc or IIIC.

Jerry


Marvin Wallace wrote:
Thanks Jerry,
I was thinking of the Contessa, did you ever use one.
Marvin.

-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:59 AM
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Super Ikonta B and III and IV

Marvin

You are obviously thinking of the Contessa and /or the Super Nettel, both 35mm folders.

Jerry


Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I too like the Super Ikonta but not the B its too heavy with average
lens.The later ikontas are a pleasure though the lenses are a little low in
contrast.
If memory serves me correctly the 645 prone to light leaks and even one in
excellent condition is not very valuable,at least for Ziess.
They did make a very desirable compact 35 folder, maybe you can recall the
name.
Marvin.
Sent via BlackBerryR from 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:08:51 To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT:  Super Ikonta B and III and IV


At 06:03 PM 10/2/2008, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
 >Marc,
 >
 >I too am an enthusiastic fan of the late Super Ikonta B mit MX shutter.
 >Wonderful camera!
 >B&W negative ar almost as sharp as those from my Rolleiflex 2.8F.
 >
 >My enthusiasm was engendered from my fathers  pre-war Super Ikonta A, a
 >jewel of a camera

The 645 A's now bear a premium in the market. They re cute little things and are magnificently capable with modern films.

Marc


m

---
Ro

Other related posts: