Marvin, Yes I did. Cute camera, but I did prefer the Retina IIIc or IIIC. Jerry Marvin Wallace wrote:
Thanks Jerry, I was thinking of the Contessa, did you ever use one. Marvin. -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:59 AM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Super Ikonta B and III and IV MarvinYou are obviously thinking of the Contessa and /or the Super Nettel, both 35mm folders.Jerry Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:I too like the Super Ikonta but not the B its too heavy with averagelens.The later ikontas are a pleasure though the lenses are a little low incontrast.If memory serves me correctly the 645 prone to light leaks and even one inexcellent condition is not very valuable,at least for Ziess.They did make a very desirable compact 35 folder, maybe you can recall thename.Marvin. Sent via BlackBerryR from 3 -----Original Message----- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:08:51 To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Super Ikonta B and III and IV At 06:03 PM 10/2/2008, Jerry Lehrer wrote: >Marc, > >I too am an enthusiastic fan of the late Super Ikonta B mit MX shutter. >Wonderful camera! >B&W negative ar almost as sharp as those from my Rolleiflex 2.8F. > >My enthusiasm was engendered from my fathers pre-war Super Ikonta A, a >jewel of a cameraThe 645 A's now bear a premium in the market. They re cute little things and are magnificently capable with modern films.Marc m--- Ro