[rollei_list] Re: OT: Stereo Photography
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:16:03 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:05 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Stereo Photography
I didn't see your reply among all the static. Sorry. I
think the argument about the lenses being parallel is
probably right since the usual viewing arrangement is such
that the effective angle of view of the camera is duplicated
at the eye including the effective orthogonal image. There
are, of course, imperfections in the stereo image, mostlby
because it is correct only in one plane and the eye wants it
to be correct in others. This is also an answer to those who
think stereo pictures need to have almost infinite depth of
field. Actually, limiting the depth of field can cover up a
multitude of problems beside serving the same purpose it
does in single images of directing the eye where its wanted.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
