All reports I've read indicate that 510-Pyro eliminates most or all of the problems you mention regarding older Pyro versions. I guess folks are using it diluted anywhere from 50:1 to 500:1, some with rotary processing, some with hand-agitation & some using semi-stand development. We live in interesting times for all sorts of photography.... Jeff On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Kelley" <jlkphoto@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:37 AM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT Pyro & other developers > WAS:Rollei Retro Film > > > > Richard, thanks for the detailed info. You wrote "All > > ancient history" in > > your reply but there has been somewhat of a revival of > > interest in B&W and > > various newer formulae, especially Pyro variations. > > For example, 510-Pyro from Jay DeFehr gets rave reviews > > from most users: > > ascorbic acid 5g > > pyrogallol 10g > > phenidone .25g > > Triethanolamine 100ml > > > > The concentrate apparently has near infinite shelf life > > vs. other Pyro > > developers. The above concentrate is mixed 1:100 with > > water for a one-shot > > staining developer. > > > > I've mixed up a batch but have not had a chance to try it > > yet. > > Jeff > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Richard Knoppow > > <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > A curious formua with three reducing agents. There are > older formulas which combine Pyro and Metol. In these the > Metol is more a preservative for the pyro than an active > developing agent. Perhaps the same thing is happening here > but I wonder what the pyro is supposed to do since Phenidone > and ascorbic acid form a perfectly effective developer by > themselves. > One reason pyro had a bad reputation in the old days was > the instability of some of the formulas. In particular it > was common to alkalize using ammonia. Ammonia is volitile so > the strength of the formula would change day by day. Another > problem, and one faced by the movie industry after the > introduction of sound, was that pyro negatives with a stain > image are very difficult to analyse and control using a > densitometer. The densitometer must respond _exactly_ as the > print film does. The introduction of photographic sound to > movies caused a revolution in laboratory methods because the > sound must be printed onto the same film as the picture and > requires very much closer control if the distortion is to be > minimized. Before sound camera negatives were often > developed by inspection and one was at the mercy of the lab > man to get good results. The requirements of sound printing > and the change to panchromatic film (necessitated by a > change in the kind of lighting equipment needed for silence > on the set) changed all this and resulted in the wide > application of sensitometry and automatic processing. Stain > images could not be made predictably so negative development > went from the traditional pyro to M-H developers like D-76. > With the increase in availability of good M-H formulas and > tons of research being done on it the traditional pyro > developers fell by the wayside although they remain > favorites to this day. > It would be interesting to compare some of the new pyro > developers to traditional ones like Kodak D-1 or D-7 > (pyro-metol). > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list