On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For the focal length, the RF was entirely adequate, in my experience. Hi Alan - You may recall we started this thread because the Rollei 35 has no rangefinder, and many commented that even with its 40 mm lens there was no need for one. So a marginal rangefinder worked OK on this camera. > For exposure, I mostly relied on the vast latitude of color negative or B&W > film to pull me through complex lighting situations, but there were other > means of controlling exposure. Backlight compensation was provided with a > switch that added exposure by +1.5 f stops (+2 in my sample.) In addition, > however, a fine degree of manual override was made possible by adjusting > ASA, a technique I used often. That back light lever tripled as the self-timer switch and a camera support! I suspect we all used the ASA control for exposure comp, but as it only went up to ASA 800, there was no help in many situations... Sorry if it sounds like I'm calling someone's baby ugly, because I'm not. It is an ok camera with an ok lens. I think it's best feature was that, at the time, it was about the smallest 35 mm full frame option around, so at least you had a camera with you to capture something... Eric Goldstein --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list