At 10:57 AM 8/2/06 -0700, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: >Or more like Coca-Cola with a near paramilitary hold on its brand name. Slobodan Coca-Cola bitterly resisted even the term "Coke" for years and their advertisements always stated, "ask for it by name". Coca-Cola ran ads on the back pages of National Geographic for decades, and their WWII-era ads are really fascinating, as they are war art and show such unrealities as a bunch of sweating mechanics working on a P-40 in some South-West Pacific jungle airstrip and swigging Coca-Cola fresh out of an iced cooler. If the truth be told, no one on that airstrip had seen a Coca-Cola for months and the existence of crystallized H2O was generally regarded as a myth by those stalwarts. But the art is most interesting. Around 1960, Coca-Cola finally acknowledged the term, "Coke", and began putting it onto their bottles. A paradigm shift brought about, I suspect, by the advent of younger management types. Marc msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list