Yep. No argument. Some are dogs and I don't believe that their QC is quite up to the standards of some of the Camera companies either, but when you find a good example of some of their better lenses (EX line is almost all fantastic) you've got a great tool. I use an 18-50/2.8, a 50-150/2.8 and I rented a 10-20/4-5.6 for a wedding this last weekend and was very impressed and will very likely get one. Their new 70/2.8 Macro is getting rave reviews as one of the sharpest Macros ever made. Again, they already make some 4:3 lenses, they'd be brilliant to make a camera that took those lenses but used their Foveon tech.
(I don't think they make lenses in Rollei mount though.) :) Be well, Michael Eric Berube Eric Goldstein wrote:
Some Sigma lenses are notoriously horrible. The original 400/5.6 APO is a good example. Eric Goldstein
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
