At 05:52 PM 4/19/06 -0700, Richard Knoppow wrote: > There is a little more to it. Its the base line plus >whatever magnification there is in the viewer. Leica thread >mount cameras have a 2X telescope in the rangefinder so the >effective baselind of the rangefinder is doubled. Cameras >like the Ektra and Contax, which have the rangefinder image >combined with the viewfinder, can not have telescopes so >must have a physically longer rangefinder baseline for the >same focus sensitivity. Absolutely right, Richard. This table will probably get mushed up in the sending, but here goes: Camera real baseline magnification effective baseline early Contax I 103mm 0.9X? 92.7mm? later Contax I 93mm 0.9X? 83.7mm? Contax II/III 93mm 0.75X 69.75mm Contax IIa/IIIa 73mm 0.66X 48.18mm Leica II 38mm 1.0X 38mm Leica III - IIIg 38mm 1.5X 57mm Leica IV 60mm 0.9X 54mm Leica M3 69.25mm 0.92X 63.71mm Leica M2/M4/M6 69.25mm 0.72X 49.86mm Leica M6J & M6HM 69.25mm 0.85X 58.86mm Kodak Ektra 104.775mm 2.2X 231mm Kodak Retina RF ? ? ? Voigtländer Prominent 40mm? 0.55X? 22mm? Zeiss Jena Werra III/IV 50.0mm? 0.75X? 37.5mm? The Ektra did have a 2.2X RF which gave it the incredible EBL of 231mm. I ought to finish this list off by at least putting in the Retina IIIc data, as I have a couple sitting across the room from me, though I didn't when I compiled this list in the middle 1990's. Marc msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! NEW FAX NUMBER: +540-343-8505 --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list