[rollei_list] Re: Not My Definition of a Thoroughbred (Re: Nikon vs.
- From: "John A. Lind" <jalind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:55:13 -0500
At 06:16 AM 4/13/2005, Larry Cuffe wrote:
>US ebay search this morning:
>Canon F-1N 9 hits
>Nikon F 901 hits
>This may be a statistical fluke, but my impresion that theres more F
>gear around.
>All the best
>Larry Cuffe
I believe it's more than a statistical fluke. You're presumptive that a
Google search can accurately survey the population numbers of Canon F-1N's
and Nikon F's. I believe that presuption to be seriously flawed. The
Nikon F system is highly collectible and sites (web pages) abound with
information about it. There is a very strong web presence about the Nikon
F system. The Canon F-1N system is not "collectible" and the web presence
of sites (web pages) about it are nearly non-existent. There is no
correlation between that and the population of gear. I'm presuming you're
limiting this to *only* the original Nikon F and *only* the Canon F-1N, and
not all the other bodies in their respective systems.
-- John Lind
Other related posts:
