[rollei_list] Re: Meters and Film

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:22:11 -0700


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Dodge" <dannysoar@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:02 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Meters and Film


Weston didn't even own a meter for most of his career. He took very long exposures of a toilet, with gos of reciprocity in a Mexican bathroom. Are Ansel Adams ' prints any better for all his scientific thinking?

---


Well, actually yes, or at least maybe. I've seen a great many original Weston and Adams prints here at the Getty and at the Huntington. A lot of the Huntington prints are too dark. I am not quite sure of the provenance of these prints so perhaps they were bad beacause Weston could not afford to toss them. The prints made by his sons from the same negatives are excellent. This is not to say that all of Weston's prints are bad but some sure are. Adams is harder to judge because many prints of his negatives were made by students. Some very familiar scenes show great variation in printing at different times and some very obviously have more work put into them that others. Weston and Adams knew each other and Adams helped Weston in technical problems. He also made sure Weston had film sometimes giving him boxes of new film he first opened and told Weston were surplus to his needs. Weston's eye was the thing. I consider him an artist something I do not credit many photograhers with. I must also add that the images of both Weston and Adams as reproduced in modern museum cataloges is often superior to the original prints. I say this having seen both. I am aware that this is heresy but its still the truth. I must say that the Zone System is based on good sensitometric principles. My disagreement with it has to do with its complexity in practice and that it leaves out some factors having to do with human perception.

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: