[rollei_list] Re: Mark William Rabiner and Digital
- From: Elias Roustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:30:22 -0400
he will cheerfully tell you that he went to the Dark Side from the
convenience of digital.
I know I have a lot to learn yet, but I don't see the convenience
angle. Post processing digital files is a pain in the A. I really
think it is as bad as scanning film.
The image (or file) is a moving target from start to finish. It's
difficult to set color or even sharpness, as these are device and
software dependent all the time, and so you never really know what you
shot. Maybe, Mark, it's my 4/3s system camera that's a fault. : )
Digital comes in handy for a lot of things, and being serious,
convenience is a key factor, but I find that it comes into usefulness
very specifically. It's not a superior substitute for film. For me it
does a very different job.
E.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
