[rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?

  • From: Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:04:27 -0500

Only because I thought it would be fun.  :-)

And because I worry about the day that Paul
Ebel tells me my shutters have all gone beyond
repair and the used market thins out.

In the meantime, my C and E and Teles will
continue to serve my purposes.


Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:37 -0800
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>

What is it with the FX that attracts you that you do not feel you get with
good-condition earlier models?
Richard S.

A guy can dream, yes?  Judging from
Emmanuel's reply, I am not alone here:


Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:12 +0100
From: Emmanuel Bigler <Emmanuel.Bigler@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?


But I agree that most of the rolleiphile gang including myself would
like something like a modern Rolleicord, a modern 2.8 E3 or 3.5 E3 with
no built-in meter, ...

Yeah!  _That's_ what I'm talking about!  :-)

Other related posts: