[rollei_list] Re: Looking for Rolleiflex F ... 3.5E flare
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:27:40 +0000 (GMT)
From my direct experience, I never found important
quality differences between the prints(10x10cm to
30x30 or 30x40cm) and slides taken with the Rolleis
TLR that I used intensively(considering similars and
different lighting (Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar,
Rolleimagic Xenar, Rolleiflex 3.5E Planar (five
elements)and now Rolleicord IV Xenar 3.5/75 -I'll see
the 3.5F-. I could see slight better performance for
the Xenotar at f/2.8 in comparison with the f/3.5 in
the bigger prints.
I think that the main issue about the old TLR is to
consider the way they have aged along the years and
then the specific model almost has not significance.
Each individual camera has aged different according
the use, maintenance and climate, it's very difficult
to do a distinction considering only the model today,
it's much more important the way the camera has aged.-
All the best
Carlos
--- redleica <redleica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
escribió:
> Thanks Carlos,
> I had a 3.5 F Plnr, the quality of the prints I got
> from this camera lens combo left me speechless.
> The camera was not in good condition however and I
> traded it for a better condition 3.5E Plnr version,
> however I have experienced a huge difference in the
> prints I get from the two Plannars. The 3.5E
> exhibiting very high unprintable contrast range and
> flare.
> I am sure many people have asked this question, is
> it true that there should be no perceptable
> difference between results on 3.5E Planar and 3.5F
> Planar models?
> I ask this question as I as I have mentioned I see a
> huge difference and would like to find out if my
> experience is typical.
> :
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:45:57
> To:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Looking for Rolleiflex F
> ... 3.5E flare
>
> --- redleica <redleica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> escribió:
>
>
> > ...One issue I would like to raise is that the
> flare
> on
> > my 3.5 E. Plannar model is very high, has anyone
> > else experienced this?...
> > Marvin.
> >
>
> A very high flare could be caused due to dust too
> much
> between the lens element or perhaps a bit of haze. I
> had a 3.5E, when I noticed flare for lighting
> situations that the lens (and camera) handled very
> good before, I looked through the lens with the
> shutter open and locked at B position and diaphragm
> wide open against a light source, I could see dust
> too
> much between the lens element; after I sent the
> camera
> for CLA (the lens was cleaned), the excessive flare
> disappeared.
> BTW the excessive flare also could be caused due to
> a
> damaged lens coating, pasted lens elements
> separation,
> scratches or a light seal tube loose or in bad
> condition.-
>
> All the best
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
>
> 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
> Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
> http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
> Thanks for your message,
> God bless You.
>
Marvin.F?ez"â²Óè²Ûh®?ez)b²×ëyéb²Û(®®nÇ+?·?¶º%?è¥?Ëkz«?²×ëyéb²Û(®
"¶.nÇ+?·¢?Ø^²æãyË_?é]9ò??
>
?x"?Ú0Ãëyéb²Û(®'²æìr¸?y«k¢Y^?X¬¶·ª¹ë-~·??+-²?àÂ+aº{.nÇ+?·¢?Ø^²æãyË_?é]9ò??
?x"?Ú0Ãëyéb²Û(®§?)Þ±æ«r??æ«r¯zÆ«y«Ú?V??æ?Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+?ö«r¯zÏë¢Y^?X¬
___________________________________________________________
1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
