[rollei_list] Re: Leica
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:28:05 -0800
It's would not make for smart business to retrofit Canon's older cameras
with some digital back when they are trying to sell newer ones. This is
wishful thinking but something that only camera collectors would really
want.
On 1/2/06, Javier Perez <summarex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don;t think Canon really cares much about primes. Not sure of the
> figures
> but it would appear that zooms are now the dominant lenses in AF
> photography, film or digital. Hey waitaminute, If they have bought Leica,
> maybe they are looking for a prime maker.
>
> I would love a full frame digital back for the 1v. I would forget about
> getting a 1ds2 forever!
> But I doubt Canon would allow it. They would have done so already if they
> wanted to. I will wait ptiently for third parties to offer it!
>
> See Ya
> Javier
>
> >From: Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Leica
> >Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
> >
> >Certainly it is a sweeping statement anbout Canon
> >wideangles. What Canon DOES lack is a decent prime
> >lens between 14mm and 35mm - the zooms are pretty
> >decent, really, but Canon does need to do better.
> >
> >I like the idea of the Modul R - now imagine it with a
> >full-frame Canon sensor - and also available for the
> >1V and 3. I think it could sell...
> >Imagine also a digital M with one of Canon's
> >superlative full-frame CMOS sensors. Yum yum!
> >
> >I don't see why Mitsubishi would need to sell Nikon,
> >though.
> >
> >Nick
> >
> >--- "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > You are making a sweeping statement here. Not all
> > > Canon WA lenses are soft
> > > in the corners/edges. Check out some of the more
> > > expensive L lenses. The
> > > Canon 35mm F1.4L is better at F1.4 than the
> > > comparable Summilux 35mm F1.4.
> > > As to the Leica 12.8MP back, I am only familiar with
> > > the Digital Module R.
> > > At $6K it is an expensive option for a camera that
> > > is already passe. Think
> > > about it, why spend this on a back that provides a
> > > small APS-sized sensor
> > > when you can get an entirely new modern AF SLR like
> > > a Canon EOS 5D with a
> > > full frame sensor. Makes little sense unless you are
> > > a wealthy lawyer or
> > > doctor. Besides at 3lbs with an R9 combination it is
> > > a huge beast of a
> > > combination.
> > > I do agree that this spells trouble for Nikon and
> > > others. My bet is Nikon
> > > will be bought in the next year either by SONY or
> > > Zeiss, more likely Zeiss.
> > > Sony typically does not like to buy companies.
> > >
> > > Peter K
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/1/06, Mike Stoesz <mstoesz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Canon wide-angle lenses are notoriously soft in
> > > the corners on the
> > > > full-frame DSLRs. Leica makes the worlds
> > > best/sharpest WA lenses and
> > > > they are coming out with a line for their SLR with
> > > 12.7mp dig. back.
> > > >
> > > > If this happens, Canon/Leica with be the run-a-way
> > > victor in DSLRs and
> > > > lenses. Nikon will be very hard pressed to
> > > compete in the pro WA
> > > > catagory.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 09:21:45 -0700
> > > > George Burnette <georgeburnette@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Wow
> > > > > Solve the soft corner problem?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/31/05, A. Lal <alal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FWIW:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >http://jancology.com/blog/archives/2005/12/28/leicanon.html
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Rollei List
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Subscribe at
> > > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> > > > > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > > www.freelists.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Unsubscribe at
> > > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > > > > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by
> > > logging into
> > > > > >www.freelists.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > > > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Rollei List
> > > >
> > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with 'subscribe'
> > > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > > www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with
> > > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > > into www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter K
> > > ÓÕ
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________________________
> >Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
> >voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> >---
> >Rollei List
> >
> >- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> >in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> >- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> >'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> >- Online, searchable archives are available at
> >//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
--
Peter K
ÃÂÃÂ
Other related posts:
