[rollei_list] Re: K-14 processing USA bought film in Europe

  • From: Thor Legvold <tlegvold@xxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:41:41 +0100

Hi Richard,

thanks for the answer. As usual, you are an authority on most things photographic.

Now that you mention it, I do seem to recall something about new processing machines, and only accepting 35mm stock, thus bringing an end to 120 processing. I will know for sure tomorrow (will call Switzerland and ask).

I don't want the highly saturated look. It's nice here in the winter (rain, overcast, low contrast, diffused lighting and subtle hues) to exagerate what is here, but is terrible for other things (well lit subjects, portraits, etc). Plus, K64 has a "look" I can't exactly describe, but it seems both more natural (colour & saturation) but at the same time 3 dimensional and real with a lot of depth and solidity to objects (not flat, as many other emulsions appear). This may be simply a question of better exposure on the K64 giving the "pop" we all look for when compared to other emulsions. I know I have Velvia slides that do it as well, but not as consistently.

Cheers,
Thor


On 23 Mar, 2006, at 23:13, Richard Knoppow wrote:


----- Original Message ----- From: "Thor Legvold" <tlegvold@xxxxxxx> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <rolleiusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:32 PM Subject: [rollei_list] K-14 processing USA bought film in Europe


After browsing around FleaBay earlier, I found a lot of K64 in 120 I'd really like to buy. However, it's in the US, which means probably no preåaid processing mailers. I send all my 35mm K64 to the national Kodak headquarters who forwards it to Switzerland for processing. Usually I get it back in just over a week (either they're super effiecient, or I'm the only one using them).

If I buy US film, how can I have it processed in Europe? And at what
price? Does anyone know? I'd love to shoot K64 in 120 again :-), it's a
really nice alternative to Velvia when you absolutely don't want the
super-saturated look.

Cheers,
Thor

---
Rollei List

AFAIK, K-14 processing for 120 film has not been available for several years. Kodak required its processing labs to buy new machines. These worked for 35mm only. I think there is now only one lab even for 35mm film.
I used a lot of Kodachrome and never found it to have the gaudy look it did in the 1940's. Fuji transparency film is highly saturated and may give you what you want. I think Kodachrome's main virtue is its very stable dark storage. That makes it attractive for stock photos.
Kodachrome is a curiosity: it was developed really as a work-around because Kodak could not find a method of anchoring the color couplers in the emulsion. Instead Kodak put the couplers in the color developers and relied on a complex processing method to isolate the colors to the right layers. Agfa beat Kodak to the punch in developing a method of anchoring but the overall quality of early Agfa color film was not very good. Kodak devised another method of anchoring the coupler molecules a few years later and used it for Kodacolor.
Kodak began to make incorporated coupler films for professional use after WW-2 but the quality of the reversal film did not come up to Kodachrome. However, Kodachrome in sheet film sizes was discontinued.
IMO, it took decades for incorporated coupler color films to come up to the standard set by Kodachrome but I think they were. In any case, 120 Kodachrome is a complete orphan.


---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


--- Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: