Er, my M6 with either collapsible Elmar or Summicron-C. It's really a LOT smaller than my FM2. The smallest 35mm SLR I have ever used is the Pentax MX with 40mm f2.8 Pancake, and it's still bigger and bulkier than the M6. But if I want a pocketable M, I use the CL, of course..... Nick --- Fred Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Say you put this lens : > http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=5&productNr=1430 > on a > Nikon FM2, and some normal lens on your M6. Which > camera is bigger now > ? > Silly question I know. Who puts his M6 in the pocket > anyway ? > > Fred > > On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > Surely you jest? OK, it's small compared to AF > SLRs, > > but compared to a Pentax MX or Olympus OM1 it's a > > giant! Yet both of them are larger than the M6. > All > > very nice cameras, FWIW. > > > > Nick > > > > --- Fred Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The Nikon FM2 is very small. But I think the > Pentax > >> ME Super was a bit > >> smaller. > >> > >> Fred > >> > >> On Mar 30, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote: > >> > >>> BTW, which FULL FRAME SLRs are smaller than M > >> Leicas? > >>> Include a normal lens with your choices. They > >> gotta be 35mm > >>> cameras with 50mm lenses. > >> > >> > >> > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com