[rollei_list] Re: If Capa had digital

  • From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:37:32 -0400

As I mentioned, first generation on negative, then bump over to
digital is a likely scenario for major motion pictures. BTW the
television folks have been doing this alternative post-producing since
the 80s (then on analog video tape).

Many many major directors have gone on record stating they will NEVER
originate on high def... mentioned this in a post a few months ago.
Some of the A-list folks can't wait because the production savings
will ostensibly allow for experimentation, longer camera rolls, etc.
And yes of course digital post. The real savings will be in digital
distribution...

As for a digital interneg, I think the analogy fails as there are no
generations once you hit digital. To some degree even the traditional
steps and sequences we remember in traditional post-production fall by
the wayside in the digital realm. The linear thinking it represents is
the very antithesis of non-linear digital post.

Being a frustrated you-know-what implies that you've done some film-making...?


Eric Goldstein

--


On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There are many precedents for maintaining the first generation of
>> capture on analog and then jumping to digital for post. Shooting
>> negative with digital editing/posting/distribution is the likely
>> mainstream scenario for the motion picture industry IF they can ever
>> agree on a digital distribution standard.
>>
>>
>> Eric Goldstein
>
>
> From my monthly reading of American Cinematographer Magazine as I am a
> frustrated you know what just like half of everybody that really seems to be
> the case.
> Even if something is not shot digitally and my impression is that its
> getting to be that most things are;
> the digital workflo later must be by far superior.
> So they make a digital in effect interneg of what they shoot on film.
> So instead of color "timing" of film;
> they have computer color matching. In which they can make it look like
> anything. Warmer shadows with cooler highlights; you name it.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
> R
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: