[rollei_list] Re: IR Photography
- From: Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:07:08 +0000 (GMT)
To me, the grain in HIE is half the reason for using
it. It's the combination of huge grain, no
anti-halation layer and the IR effect that add up to
the film's unique appeal.
Nick
--- Don Williams <dwilli10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 03:01 PM 1/24/2006 +0000, you wrote:
> >Well, my dislike of HIE goes back a number of years
> when I tried a few rolls
> >in 35mm format, and I found the grain so bad it
> really took the fun out of
> >it. This may be different on a 6x6cm negative,
> however, so might be worth
> >another try.
>
> I did IR many years ago and got some interesting
> results, all in 35mm
> of course.
>
> Don't recall noticing any grain problem, but then
> again, Einstein got
> the Nobel Prize for working in that area, IR photons
> have less energy
> than shorter wavelength photons.
>
>
>
> Don Williams
> La Jolla, CA
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
