[rollei_list] Re: Extra characters in the Posted messages
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:30:17 -0500
Yes, I see them.
On Thursday, March 31, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Peter K. wrote:
> I am trying to figure that one out too. Does everyone see these
> characters in my original post? Please reply. Perhaps it is something
> at my end.
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:06:30 -0800, Jerry Lehrer
> <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wro=
> te:
>> Peter,
>> =20
>> Include the lens, bitte!
>> =20
>> 2.5 vs. 1.5 is hardly a TAD, it is 2/3 more!
>> =20
>> BTW, WTF is this =3D20 that appears in some
>> messages of yours? Can you or your server
>> suppress this annoying artifact?
>> =20
>> Can someone who knows more about
>> computers than you or me, address this topic?
>> =20
>> Jerry
>> =20
>> "Peter K." wrote:
>> =20
>>> Jerry,=3D20
>>>
>>> The Pentax *ist 35mm SLR is shorter in length (4.8 v 5.3), equally as
>>> tall, but a tad thicker at 2.5 v. 1.5. Then again it also has a built
>>> in motor, can rewind itself, has faster sync speeds and shutter
>>> speeds, has automated flash, and most importantly, you will not cry
>>> if
>>> you drop it. ;-)
>>>
>>> Peter K
>>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:36 -0800, Jerry Lehrer
>>> <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>=
> wro=3D
>>> te:
>>>> Peter,
>>>> =3D20
>>>> Marc and I may take exception to your comment re: Jupiter
>>>> lenses. I don't own any but I have tried a few and they are
>>>> superb!
>>>> =3D20
>>>> BTW, which FULL FRAME SLRs are smaller than M Leicas?
>>>> Include a normal lens with your choices. They gotta be 35mm
>>>> cameras with 50mm lenses. Remember, the Olympus Pen is
>>>> half frame,
>>>> =3D20
>>>> I await your selections.
>>>> =3D20
>>>> Jerry
>>>> =3D20
>>>> =3D20
>>>> "Peter K." wrote:
>>>> =3D20
>>>>> Jupiter lens on a Leica? Ugh! Marc, Carl and Ernst are rolling in
>>>>> their graves after you typed this. The only reason to use the
>>>>> archa=
> ic
>>>>> Leica M is to use take advantage of the M optics. Other than that
>>>>> there is little reason. Even SLRs these days are as small.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:10:11 -0500, Marc James Small
>>>>> <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> At 11:56 PM 3/28/05 -0500, Ardeshir Mehta wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right about a Leica III (I was thinking of getting =
> one =3D
>>> =3D3D3D2=3D3D
>>>>> 0
>>>>>>> myself on eBay), but they are more properly paired off with =3D3=
> D3D20
>>>>>>> Rolleicords, not Rolleiflexes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But try getting an M3 or higher - M4, M6, etc. - on eBay for any=
> thin=3D
>>> g =3D3D
>>>>> =3D3D3D20
>>>>>>> less than $1,000! I got a Rolleiflex D, equipped f/2.8 Xenotar, =
> in =3D
>>> =3D3D3D20
>>>>>>> almost perfect working condition (only the sports viewfinder mir=
> ror =3D
>>> is =3D3D
>>>>> =3D3D3D20
>>>>>>> missing) for US$255 plus shipping. I WISH I could get an M3 that=
> =3D3D=3D
>>> 3D20
>>>>>>> cheaply - I'd JUMP at the chance!
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> Apples to apples, again.
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> The IIIc Leica equates to a Rolleiflex Automat in terms of vintag=
> e an=3D
>>> d us=3D3D
>>>>> e
>>>>>> at the time they were produced, both being then professional came=
> ras.=3D
>>> An=3D3D
>>>>> d
>>>>>> a IIIc with its standard Summitar will run about as much as an Au=
> toma=3D
>>> t in
>>>>>> equivalent condition. =3D3D3D20
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> In today's market, an M6 equates to a 2.8GX. See which is cheape=
> r in=3D
>>> the
>>>>>> used market!
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> Your issue about lenses for the M6 is a bit misleading: a solid =
> Jupi=3D
>>> ter-=3D3D
>>>>> 3
>>>>>> will run around $100 and a Leitz LTM to M adapter will run around=
> $70=3D
>>> , so
>>>>>> add $170 (or more, if you wish to use a Leica lens) to the price =
> of t=3D
>>> he M=3D3D
>>>>> 3
>>>>>> or M4 or M6.
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> The M4 does have an inflated price, one that I regard as improper=
> ly
>>>>>> inflated, as I find it a weak sister in the Leitz line and a came=
> ra w=3D
>>> hich
>>>>>> lives much more on reputation than on performance. The M3 and M6=
> are
>>>>>> substantially superior cameras.
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> Marc
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx=3D3D3D20
>>>>>> Cha robh b=3D3D3DE0s fir gun ghr=3D3D3DE0s fir!
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>> =3D3D20
>>>>>
>>>>> --=3D3D20
>>>>> Peter K
>>>>> =3D3DD3=3D3DBF=3D3DD5=3D3DAC
>>>> =3D20
>>>> =3D20
>>>
>>> --=3D20
>>> Peter K
>>> =3DD3=3DBF=3DD5=3DAC
>> =20
>> =20
>
>
> --=20
> Peter K
> =D3=BF=D5=AC
>
>
Other related posts:
