Richard,The last picture shows what in lesser cameras are called "Zeiss Bumps",, right?
The pictures are clear enough, couldn't you see them? Jerry Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "X.TRUONG" <truongthx@xxxxxxx> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:59 PM Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Earlier 2.8F Xenotar Dear Mr Freaza,In fact, I am contacting with a seller for him 2.8F, but I am not experiencein Rollei. You please see some photos about it: http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/9683/17en0.jpg http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/281/12kb3.jpg http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/4440/15ue9.jpg http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/8835/14jl6.jpg http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/8084/13qy7.jpg http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7569/16su8.jpg You see. The camera & lens serial no. But in the last photo, the leather have some prominent points, maybe the leather had scaled off and sticked again, or the camera had been CLA or repaired something... According to you, the camera is good with price $850? Thank you very much! Xuan TruongI'm not sure what I am seeing in the last photo, it looks like brassing of the neck strap connector and some other places but may be a reflection of something. I also see what looks like a ding on the lensboard cover and perhaps signs of being repainted, Again these may only be artifacts of the photo, the quality of of the pictures is not very good, perhaps taken with a cell phone (I am not kidding).-- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- R
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list