[rollei_list] Re: E6 funny - dev issue or shutter?

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:19:41 -0800


----- Original Message ----- From: <chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:50 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: E6 funny - dev issue or shutter?


Taken the slides out from the sleeve and no question its on the slide!. To
answer Jims earlier questions then :
120 film; Rollei TLR - 2.8FX; the darker strip is obvious on the sky, whether it continues through on the lower half of the frame is not clear as this was an area of snow. The strip boundary is well defined, slightly blurry on the edges and 'exactly' vertical. The strip is on the left side of
the image.
Monopod, shot into the sun a bit (not directly of course), hood, no filter.
Dont see the effect on any of the other frames
I'll be in a position to scan it in a week or so and will post it to the
flickr RUG.
Doesnt seem to be on any of the other frames - there is a similar image with
lots of sky for example.
Hmmm!



On 2/16/07, chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx <chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Jim
thanks for this fulsome reply -
I've put my answers in-line below -- uh-oh --- I have a bad feeling I may have wasted your time. The slides came in a continous sheet of poly - I havent taken them out yet but I have a feeling that it may actually only be a not very obvious denser strip on the wrapping....! When I go home and get
a knife out I will come back - if not too ashamed :-)



>
>
> Some simple observations/questions:
>
> Darker means less exposure for the strip.
> Does the darker strip continue through the whole frame > or just in the
> sky portion of the frame?





Is the darker strip sharp or does it have fuzzy edges?


Edge  is fuzzy but not irregular


A BTL shutter will not cause what you see.
> What model Rollei were you using? TLR? SLR?
> If using a focal lane shutter, the curtains could have > varied in > width during their travel causing an underexposed strip > somewhere on the
> frame.
> Was the photograph taken hand held or on a tripod?
> Processing anomalies will not effect only one frame.
> Filters?
> Flare or reflections will typically not cause a darker > area, they
> usually causes lighter areas.
> Was the film 120 or 220?
>
> Jim
>

Can you see anything in the space between frames? If its a processing anomoly you should see it continuously. You may need a strong light to see the frame lines. Is it possible that something could have been inside the camera box, perhaps a scrap of the gummed paper at the ends of the film roll? Another thought, although unlikely: if you were using a lens shade could it have been on crooked so that one edge intruded into the picture area?

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: