On 6/17/07 6:50 PM, "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurence Cuffe" <cuffe@xxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 8:17 AM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Disturbing Lack of Traffic OT > Koni Omega > > >> >> On Sunday, June 17, 2007, at 07:53AM, "Marvin Wallace" >> <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Here one for the list, as far as Medium format cameras go, >>> as anyone ever >>> used anything like the Koni Omega? >>> Regards, >>> Marvin >> >> I've got one, which I use with the wide angle "58mm / >> 60mm"lens. I believe both are the same lens, just labeled >> differently for import purposes. >> They're a classic walk around camera, not so expensive >> that your always worrying about it,and built tough enough >> so that the occasional trip to the pavement when your >> juggling too many things at once doesn't kill it. The 58 >> is a very nice lens, and not expensive. >> If your buying one make sure its got all the dark-slides >> present, otherwise you wont be able to change lenses mid >> roll. If your using one, make sure you pull the film wind >> lever all the way out and shove it all the way back after >> each shot, as otherwise you may have problems with >> overlapping frames. >> Karen Nakamura has a nice bit about it on her >> Photoethnography web site, >> <http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?KoniOmega >> RapidM.html~mainFrame> >> Its also a bit of a conversation starter, people always >> want to know about it:- a bit like a rollei in that >> respect but it seems to attract more general interest. >> Hope this helps, >> All the best >> Larry Cuffe >>> > As the link above points out this camera was designed > for press work. The original version was made by Simmon > Brothers, the makers of the Omega enlarger, hence the name. > I believe this camera originated the "ideal" format on 120 > film, that is, a format having the same aspect ratio as 4x5. > Despite many good qualities the camera came along just about > when press photographers were switching from the traditional > 4x5 Speed Graphics to 35mm cameras so it never became > popular with the market it was intended for. The Konica > version has many changes from the original but is still > essentially the same camera. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- I think people would just use roll film backs and their speed or crown graphics or even use baby speeds. That's what I hear. I was born 1951 so I just saw it in early versions of Pop photography and the annuals. ...the cameras when seemed to be selling and in use. Mark Rabiner Harlem, NY markrabiner.com --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list